Manually down-voting hacks instead of auto down-voting

    So, I was posting new hacks today and they all got down-voted. I made sure that the description was as legible as possible so they wouldn't make any mistake causing an auto down-vote on my hack. Turns out the guy who down-voted my hacks were because he had the wrong process. This gets me very annoyed because previous hacks of mine were auto down-voted because people don't bother to read the description and/or had the wrong process. I checked the hacks out the to make sure if I did something wrong. Sure enough, I didn't.


    So what I'm suggesting is that people should manually down-vote hacks since many people tend to make mistakes. Also makes it easier to tell if a hacking is working or not.
    

 

I agree with the idea, however, as Mord later added, it might also be a pain since people might not even care at all to down-vote the hacks even if they genuinely don't work...
Now I'm thorn between the choices. While it would be nice if false down-votes did stop due to mistakes like people targeting wrong processes, it is also possible that posite down-votes could go unnoticed due to people being lazy to down-vote it even if all it involved was pressing a single button to do it.

    I agree. Also, maybe another suggestion could be if the hack doesn't work, there could be an option to down-vote it or not on the hack? This would get the lazy issue out :D

i think they spam vote for points

if they do and a mod notices, they get banned.

well thanks for the information about this and i will be careful about voting on hacks :D